Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren’t personally in participation, but the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments – the controversial websites providing both free casino-style games and rewarding prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can ‘bet totally free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as conventional casinos, only without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren’t subject to regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of prohibited gaming in a New York claim that declares VGW uses star endorsers to ‘develop a veneer of legitimacy’ around its product. (See VGW’s declaration listed below)

‘I’m not sure” if you don’t trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom use any differences in between conventional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of – however not all – games are totally free

Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, ads usually center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for real gambling losses.

Others lure clients with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake’s vehicles, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

‘Daddy, why do we have so much cash?’ check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: ‘Because I never ever gave up.’

The inconsistency between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the former.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for totally free.

‘Most social sweeps customers never ever make a purchase,’ the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling websites.’

Social gambling establishments provide customers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the choice to purchase worthless currency frequently referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be used to unlock numerous features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing consumers to get other currency known as ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad displaying Drake’s vehicles, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all but seven states, which has helped to the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don’t require normally need identification. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to send mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully specific guidelines. What’s more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, consequently providing a reason to attempt their hands at any number of casino video games for a possibility to win – or lose – real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is merely a method of promoting their bread and butter.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are just a form of online home entertainment,’ an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by email. ‘No purchase is needed to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement – or” factor to consider” – is an essential distinction between social sweeps and conventional online gambling sites like gambling establishments.’

Consider the manner in which McDonald’s utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, but rather they’re buying hamburgers and french fries that provide them the possibility to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘consideration’, the game itself doesn’t fulfill the definition of gaming in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all sort of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promotions are frequently utilized by a who’s who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to numerous sports betting market insiders, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald’s Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They don’t last permanently and they’re generally not tied to casino-style video games of possibility,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re simply cash giveaways.

‘The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the characteristics typically connected with McDonald’s-style sweepstakes promotions,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos provide” casino-like” payouts, generally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the typical payment percentage for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the profits made by the business [usually less than one percent]’

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, offering consumers the opportunity to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. A lot of those brick-and-mortar establishments have because been shuttered over accusations of illegal sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous star spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should deal with comparable scrutiny.

‘These distinctions are not arbitrary,’ Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. ‘They have repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state attorney generals as essential consider identifying that a sweepstakes promotion remained in truth a guise for unlawful sports betting.’

One of the casino industry’s leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

‘Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up substantial tax and profits chances as this gaming replaces that conducted through controlled channels,’ checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest lawsuit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an ‘unlawful gaming enterprise. ‘

Apple and Google have actually also been called as offenders in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com’s ask for comment.

‘We typically don’t discuss matters before the courts,’ a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. ‘However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

‘We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and stay confident about the future,’ the spokesperson continued. ‘We continue to offer our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a years, producing not only terrific video games, user experiences and entertainment, however also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively common across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to vigorously safeguard any claim which might be brought versus us.’

The problems between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos could show troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both endorse VGW’s Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting ‘sweeps’ websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance versus illegal gambling – especially when attempting to tamp down the occasional gambling scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting allegedly illegal gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,’ Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players’ representatives reacted to DailyMail.com’s ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to explain to clients the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

‘We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our business practices more broadly,’ the representative said. ‘A few of our values are” our players come first” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

‘Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful sports betting sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,’ Glaser stated. ‘There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful gambling.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton